<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Ranking Authority Foundation &#187; Search Engine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sraf.org/tag/search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sraf.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fast Ways to Increase Your Website Ranking by Using Search Engines</title>
		<link>http://www.sraf.org/2010/01/fast-ways-to-increase-your-website-ranking-by-using-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sraf.org/2010/01/fast-ways-to-increase-your-website-ranking-by-using-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 03:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet And Businesses Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gateway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sraf.org/2010/01/fast-ways-to-increase-your-website-ranking-by-using-search-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It is very important to a lot of internet users who have blogs or business websites to have high rankings on search engines. These users will have much advantage for buyers to find their product and their site if they are on top. You need to learn though, how you can achieve a higher rank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/rank_authority54.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/rank_authority54.jpg" title='' alt='' /></a></div>
<div><br/><br/>It is very important to a lot of internet users who have blogs or business websites to have high rankings on search engines. These users will have much advantage for buyers to find their product and their site if they are on top. You need to learn though, how you can achieve a higher rank on search engines.<br/><br/>The most important and cheap way is to get high rankings for your preferred keywords that you use on the search engines. The main point here is not to trick the search engine, leave them plenty of clues as to what your website is. Putting keywords into use on your site lets the consumers find what you offer much faster. Do not overstock your site or blog with keywords though, this wouldn&#8217;t help at all in your rankings, it might even pull it down much lower.<br/><br/>Always discuss good information in your blogs. Fresh contents that you publish on your blogs and website are mostly the ones a search engine recognizes. This will be a good step to increase your rankings. Most owners would want to connect to your site if you often provide new contents because this attracts new visitors as well. New visitors in your site are well thought-out as a possible client.<br/><br/>Placing web pages relevant to your site is also a way to increase your rankings on the engines. This should be done because it will be a gateway for others to find your site. Continue placing good pages on your site to attract more visitors, this will be a way for you to get a possible sale.<br/><br/>You can also include an auto responder on your site. Sending out a good response to people who subscribes to your site will definitely get you more visitors. And more visitors increase your website rankings.<br/><br/>You can also offer samples or discounted products. People like receiving something free and something that will help them save money like discount coupons. This will help in connecting your mail list to your site. This is an excellent strategy to build up your rankings as well.<br/><br/>You can also submit your articles in other sites like article directories. This can help to increase your rankings and it will let people recognize that you are well aware in what you do and what you offer.<br/><br/>These are just some ways that you can use to increase your website rankings on the search engines. If done correctly, this will prove to be very useful in getting a high rank for your site.<br/><strong>About the Author:</strong>
<div style="border: thin solid gray; padding:1em;">Check out more information on <a href='http://www.newsongny.com'>music blog</a></div>
<p><br/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sraf.org/2010/01/fast-ways-to-increase-your-website-ranking-by-using-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trust Problem in the Link-Based Popularity Ranking</title>
		<link>http://www.sraf.org/2009/09/trust-problem-in-the-link-based-popularity-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sraf.org/2009/09/trust-problem-in-the-link-based-popularity-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet And Businesses Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sraf.org/2009/09/trust-problem-in-the-link-based-popularity-ranking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The idea behind the popularity ranking algorithms is that, by linking to a page, you imply that that page deserves attention. Search engines use links to determine the authority of pages in topics described by the link anchor text. The problem is that every link is considered as a positive endorsement with no regard to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/rank_authority1.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/rank_authority1.jpg" title='' alt='' /></a></div>
<div><br/><br/>The idea behind the popularity ranking algorithms is that, by linking to a page, you imply that that page deserves attention. Search engines use links to determine the authority of pages in topics described by the link anchor text. The problem is that every link is considered as a positive endorsement with no regard to the real intention of the linking person. There is no effective way for a search engine to distinguish between positive and negative endorsements in links yet.<br/><br/>The earliest web-like development by Tim Berners-Lee &#8211; the Enquire program &ndash; allowed the usage of various types of relationships between documents, such as similar-to, part-of, or made-by. However in his later work on the World Wide Web and HTML Tim Berners-Lee has abandoned multiple-types of relationships for simplicity. Flat links with no relationship information have been used ever since.<br/><br/>This article was originally published at Trust Problem in the Link-Based Popularity Ranking.<br/><br/><strong>Link Abuse</strong><br/><br/>The absence of this feature has been widely exploited by people trying to manipulate search engines results since the introduction of the link-based popularity ranking. The most notable examples are link farms, which used to flourish just a couple years ago. Search engines had realized the problem of abuse and started penalizing link farms and sites that link to them. But still with the anchor text and the host page&rsquo;s own authority being the only parameters used to evaluate the link impact, there exist many other ways to manipulate rankings. By using anchor text large web-users communities can perform the infamous Google-bombing: see &lsquo;miserable failure&rsquo; search results in Google. And this can be employed against other search engines as well, e.g. &lsquo;&#1076;&#1088;&#1091;&#1075; &#1085;&#1072;&#1088;&#1086;&#1076;&#1072;&rsquo; (&lsquo;people&rsquo;s friend&rsquo;) query in the Russian major search engine Yandex.ru returns V.Putin&rsquo;s bio on the top of the results<br/><br/><strong>Adding Semantics Info into Link Markup</strong><br/><br/>The problem lies in the very nature of HTML. Designed as a document structure markup language it is ineffective for describing the semantics of a document. Some extensions had to be introduced into the link markup to make it able to reflect the nature of the relationship to the linked document. One example is the rev attribute. This attribute is used in the <strong>VoteLinks</strong> microformat proposed by the Technorati.com to allow users to express their opinion about linked blogs. The rev attribute in the <strong>VoteLinks</strong> format can have the following values: &lsquo;vote-for&rsquo;, &lsquo;vote-abstain&rsquo; and &lsquo;vote-against&rsquo;, thus reflecting positive, neutral and negative opinions. This makes it possible to augment or reduce the authority of the linked document respectively.<br/><br/>The rel attributes values such as &lsquo;friend&rsquo;, &lsquo;colleague&rsquo;, &lsquo;sibling&rsquo;, &lsquo;neighbor&rsquo; or &lsquo;spouse&rsquo; allow a different approach, reflecting the nature of the relationships between two documents, rather than the opinion. This approach is also used by Technorati.com and might have certain value within a community of bloggers.<br/><br/>None of these approaches is currently used by any major search engine. The rel attribute value &lsquo;nofollow&rsquo; is the only one to be taken into account by Google, MSN and Yahoo. This value is intended to show that the linking person is not certain about his approval of the linked document. The search engine crawlers are supposed not to follow such links, but many webmasters report that actually they still do. However it is possible that such links do not propagate authority.<br/><br/><strong>Possible Impact of Trust Links</strong><br/><br/>What if search engines were able to determine the trust or distrust nature of a link? Would the existing ranking be significantly different? Currently inbound links show the measure of attention to a certain page. Therefore even those pages which are linked to express distrust or even disgust might be ranked higher than positively endorsed pages for the same query.There is another approach that would have to be reconsidered. Now if page A links to page B, it propagates a fraction of its authority value to B. If there is a reciprocal link, some authority can be returned to A, so that both pages benefit from the mutual trust. But consider now that a highly ranked page A distrusts page B. Page B also adds a distrust link to A in revenge. Should we decrease the ranking of A because a distrusted page B also negatively links to it? Or should we stop considering any opinion from B?<br/><br/>To determine the effect of the search engines&rsquo; ability to distinguish between positive and negative opinions in web links <strong>Paolo Massa</strong> and <strong>Conor Hayes</strong> have conducted an experiment using the linkage data from the Epinions.com website. Epinions.com is a web community where users can write their opinions on movies, books, goods and services. It is also possible to rate to use other users&rsquo; reviews, thus expressing trust or distrust. In the experiment&rsquo;s model, users are considered as web pages, while their ratings are seen as incoming links. The 20 top ranked users were sorted by their total number of ratings (positive and negative) and by the number of the positive rankings only. The total number of rankings shows the attention to the user, which is similar to the link popularity of a web page. Using statistical methods P. Massa and C. Hayes have determined the alignment factor between the attention ranking and the trust ranking. The value is <strong>0.8</strong> and it should be noted that since people tend to assign positive ranking more frequently than negative (often a disappointed user would simply not rate ate at all) &ndash; the actual alignment value can be even less.<br/><br/>However trust linking would be ineffective in the web. The introduction of trust/distrust linking would create wide opportunities for abuse, and not just from gray spammers. Any highly-ranked website would be able to destroy authority of any less ranked competitor with a power of a single link! While in relatively small communities of bloggers (Technorati.com) or reviewers (Epinions.com) such wars can be prevented by human moderation, the existing technology still doesn&rsquo;t allow search engines to perform a similar task in the Web.<br/><br/><strong>References:</strong><br/><br/> 	Massa, P. and Hayes, C. 2005, &lsquo;Page-reRank: using trusted links to re-rank authority&rsquo;. Istituto Trentino di Cultura.  	Ntoulas, A., Cho, J., Cho, H.K., et al. 2004, &lsquo;A Study On The Evolution Of The Web&rsquo;. University of California. <br/><br/>Get more useful information on web promotion at our SEO and Web Marketing Study.<br/><strong>About the Author:</strong>
<div style="border: thin solid gray; padding:1em;">Check out more information on <a href='http://www.momentsofelegance.com/catalog/reception-decor-cake-toppers-c-88_131.html'>cake toppers</a></div>
<p><br/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sraf.org/2009/09/trust-problem-in-the-link-based-popularity-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
